UK ASA / CAP DisclosureMatelytics is an independent UK publication. We may earn commissions from links marked [Affiliate Active]. Unapproved programmes are marked [Awaiting Affiliate Approval].Affiliate Policy
Zero-Fabrication Audit Policy Active
UNITED KINGDOM GOVERNANCE & METHODOLOGYApproved 7-Pillar Framework Active

Publication Policies, Scoring Rubric & UK Legal Hub

Built specifically for United Kingdom operation—accounting for UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, PECR cookie consent, ASA/CAP affiliate advertising codes, and the UK Online Safety Act 2023.

DOCUMENT 03 / APPROVED EDITORIAL SCORING METHODOLOGY

The Matelytics 7-Pillar Weighted Scoring Framework

To ensure complete transparency and repeatability, all platform reviews are evaluated across seven distinct pillars. Scores are calculated using precise weightings, with mandatory publication gates enforcing strict evidentiary standards.

Evaluation PillarWeightCore Evaluation Focus
1. Conversational & Roleplay Quality23%Coherence, emotional nuance, prompt adherence, character consistency, and avoidance of repetitive dialogue loops.
2. Persistent Memory & Continuity18%Recall accuracy, contextual awareness, long-term continuity, and personality consistency (evaluated on observable user-facing performance).
3. Multimodal Audio & Visuals17%Voice quality, response latency, image quality, character consistency, and integration between modalities.
4. Pricing & Token Transparency (Mandatory Gate)13%Subscription clarity, token consumption models, restrictions, refund policies, and overall cost-to-value ratio.
5. Privacy & Data Handling (Mandatory Gate)12%Data collection, retention, deletion controls, sharing, encryption disclosures, and privacy controls (without legal certification claims).
6. Safety & Content Governance (Mandatory Gate)10%Age restrictions, age assurance mechanisms, content controls, moderation transparency, reporting mechanisms, and user protection.
7. User Interface & Cross-Device UX7%Usability, navigation, onboarding flow, mobile responsiveness, and application stability across devices.
TOTAL WEIGHT100%Weighted Composite Score (0.0 – 10.0)

Scoring Bands & Scale

  • • 0 – 1.5: Critically deficient
  • • 2 – 3.5: Poor
  • • 4 – 5.5: Below average
  • • 6 – 6.5: Acceptable
  • • 7 – 7.5: Good
  • • 8 – 8.5: Very good
  • • 9 – 9.5: Excellent
  • • 10: Exceptional

Mandatory Publication Gates & N/A Redistribution

To publish a numerical overall score, reviews must satisfy verification for three mandatory pillars: Pricing & Token Transparency, Privacy & Data Handling, and Safety & Content Governance. If any mandatory pillar lacks sufficient evidence, the composite score is withheld and displays “Unscored — Awaiting Full Technical Audit”.

Where a pillar is genuinely not applicable (e.g., audio/visuals for a text-only platform), it is excluded and weights are proportionally redistributed: Adjusted Weight = Original Weight / Sum of Applicable Original Weights.